diff Doc/lib/libstdtypes.tex @ 23341:55423c1abcd1 2.2

Correct information on support for repietition & concatenation for buffer and xrange objects. This closes SF bug #550555.
author Fred Drake <fdrake@acm.org>
date Thu, 02 May 2002 05:57:07 +0000
parents a443e5e5ece7
children 67bcb4f5237f
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/Doc/lib/libstdtypes.tex	Thu May 02 04:51:37 2002 +0000
+++ b/Doc/lib/libstdtypes.tex	Thu May 02 05:57:07 2002 +0000
@@ -388,15 +388,17 @@
 
 Buffer objects are not directly supported by Python syntax, but can be
 created by calling the builtin function
-\function{buffer()}.\bifuncindex{buffer}.  They don't support
-concatenation or repetition.
+\function{buffer()}.\bifuncindex{buffer}.  They support
+concatenation and repetition, but the result is a new string object
+rather than a new buffer object.
 \obindex{buffer}
 
 Xrange objects are similar to buffers in that there is no specific
-syntax to create them, but they are created using the \function{xrange()}
-function.\bifuncindex{xrange}  They don't support slicing,
-concatenation or repetition, and using \code{in}, \code{not in},
-\function{min()} or \function{max()} on them is inefficient.
+syntax to create them, but they are created using the
+\function{xrange()} function.\bifuncindex{xrange}  They don't support
+slicing or concatenation, but do support repetition, and using
+\code{in}, \code{not in}, \function{min()} or \function{max()} on them
+is inefficient.
 \obindex{xrange}
 
 Most sequence types support the following operations.  The \samp{in} and