Mercurial > cpython-lru_cache-weakref
view Python/mysnprintf.c @ 64085:4df0d2a13aa1 3.1
Merged revisions 81214,82302,82465,83090-83091,84097,84099 via svnmerge from
svn+ssh://pythondev@svn.python.org/python/branches/py3k
................
r81214 | brett.cannon | 2010-05-16 00:20:16 +0200 (dim., 16 mai 2010) | 2 lines
A test was not guaranteeing cleanup in the face of an exception.
................
r82302 | benjamin.peterson | 2010-06-28 00:37:28 +0200 (lun., 28 juin 2010) | 15 lines
Merged revisions 81380 via svnmerge from
svn+ssh://pythondev@svn.python.org/python/trunk
........
r81380 | brett.cannon | 2010-05-20 13:37:55 -0500 (Thu, 20 May 2010) | 8 lines
Turned out that if you used explicit relative import syntax
(e.g. from .os import sep) and it failed, import would still try the implicit
relative import semantics of an absolute import (from os import sep). That's
not right, so when level is negative, only do explicit relative import
semantics.
Fixes issue #7902. Thanks to Meador Inge for the patch.
........
................
r82465 | brett.cannon | 2010-07-03 03:32:48 +0200 (sam., 03 juil. 2010) | 3 lines
Make test_import a little bit more robust for cleaning up after itself in the
face of a failure.
................
r83090 | brett.cannon | 2010-07-23 16:03:16 +0200 (ven., 23 juil. 2010) | 4 lines
Explicitly test relative imports by reusing importlib tests.
Closes issue 8392. Thanks Virgil Dupras for the initial patch.
................
r83091 | brett.cannon | 2010-07-23 16:45:19 +0200 (ven., 23 juil. 2010) | 1 line
Stop shadowing a test class.
................
r84097 | florent.xicluna | 2010-08-16 20:41:19 +0200 (lun., 16 août 2010) | 1 line
Use test.support and unittest features. Fix duplicated test (bad merge in r79033). Fix comment for issue #7902.
................
r84099 | florent.xicluna | 2010-08-16 21:03:05 +0200 (lun., 16 août 2010) | 1 line
I get it wrong in r84097: s/relative/absolute/
................
| author | Florent Xicluna <florent.xicluna@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| date | Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:40:45 +0000 |
| parents | f197407bdba2 |
| children |
line wrap: on
line source
#include "Python.h" /* snprintf() wrappers. If the platform has vsnprintf, we use it, else we emulate it in a half-hearted way. Even if the platform has it, we wrap it because platforms differ in what vsnprintf does in case the buffer is too small: C99 behavior is to return the number of characters that would have been written had the buffer not been too small, and to set the last byte of the buffer to \0. At least MS _vsnprintf returns a negative value instead, and fills the entire buffer with non-\0 data. The wrappers ensure that str[size-1] is always \0 upon return. PyOS_snprintf and PyOS_vsnprintf never write more than size bytes (including the trailing '\0') into str. If the platform doesn't have vsnprintf, and the buffer size needed to avoid truncation exceeds size by more than 512, Python aborts with a Py_FatalError. Return value (rv): When 0 <= rv < size, the output conversion was unexceptional, and rv characters were written to str (excluding a trailing \0 byte at str[rv]). When rv >= size, output conversion was truncated, and a buffer of size rv+1 would have been needed to avoid truncation. str[size-1] is \0 in this case. When rv < 0, "something bad happened". str[size-1] is \0 in this case too, but the rest of str is unreliable. It could be that an error in format codes was detected by libc, or on platforms with a non-C99 vsnprintf simply that the buffer wasn't big enough to avoid truncation, or on platforms without any vsnprintf that PyMem_Malloc couldn't obtain space for a temp buffer. CAUTION: Unlike C99, str != NULL and size > 0 are required. */ int PyOS_snprintf(char *str, size_t size, const char *format, ...) { int rc; va_list va; va_start(va, format); rc = PyOS_vsnprintf(str, size, format, va); va_end(va); return rc; } int PyOS_vsnprintf(char *str, size_t size, const char *format, va_list va) { int len; /* # bytes written, excluding \0 */ #ifdef HAVE_SNPRINTF #define _PyOS_vsnprintf_EXTRA_SPACE 1 #else #define _PyOS_vsnprintf_EXTRA_SPACE 512 char *buffer; #endif assert(str != NULL); assert(size > 0); assert(format != NULL); /* We take a size_t as input but return an int. Sanity check * our input so that it won't cause an overflow in the * vsnprintf return value or the buffer malloc size. */ if (size > INT_MAX - _PyOS_vsnprintf_EXTRA_SPACE) { len = -666; goto Done; } #ifdef HAVE_SNPRINTF len = vsnprintf(str, size, format, va); #else /* Emulate it. */ buffer = PyMem_MALLOC(size + _PyOS_vsnprintf_EXTRA_SPACE); if (buffer == NULL) { len = -666; goto Done; } len = vsprintf(buffer, format, va); if (len < 0) /* ignore the error */; else if ((size_t)len >= size + _PyOS_vsnprintf_EXTRA_SPACE) Py_FatalError("Buffer overflow in PyOS_snprintf/PyOS_vsnprintf"); else { const size_t to_copy = (size_t)len < size ? (size_t)len : size - 1; assert(to_copy < size); memcpy(str, buffer, to_copy); str[to_copy] = '\0'; } PyMem_FREE(buffer); #endif Done: if (size > 0) str[size-1] = '\0'; return len; #undef _PyOS_vsnprintf_EXTRA_SPACE }
