Mercurial > cpython-lru_cache-weakref
view Python/mysnprintf.c @ 78991:c3539eb02470
Issue #15895: my analysis was slightly off. The FILE pointer is only leaked when set_main_loader() fails for a pyc file with closeit=0. In the success case run_pyc_file() does its own cleanup of the fp. I've changed the code to use another FILE ptr for pyc files and moved the fclose() to PyRun_SimpleFileExFlags() to make it more obvious what's happening.
| author | Christian Heimes <christian@cheimes.de> |
|---|---|
| date | Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:47:28 +0200 |
| parents | cab14be0ada1 |
| children |
line wrap: on
line source
#include "Python.h" /* snprintf() wrappers. If the platform has vsnprintf, we use it, else we emulate it in a half-hearted way. Even if the platform has it, we wrap it because platforms differ in what vsnprintf does in case the buffer is too small: C99 behavior is to return the number of characters that would have been written had the buffer not been too small, and to set the last byte of the buffer to \0. At least MS _vsnprintf returns a negative value instead, and fills the entire buffer with non-\0 data. The wrappers ensure that str[size-1] is always \0 upon return. PyOS_snprintf and PyOS_vsnprintf never write more than size bytes (including the trailing '\0') into str. If the platform doesn't have vsnprintf, and the buffer size needed to avoid truncation exceeds size by more than 512, Python aborts with a Py_FatalError. Return value (rv): When 0 <= rv < size, the output conversion was unexceptional, and rv characters were written to str (excluding a trailing \0 byte at str[rv]). When rv >= size, output conversion was truncated, and a buffer of size rv+1 would have been needed to avoid truncation. str[size-1] is \0 in this case. When rv < 0, "something bad happened". str[size-1] is \0 in this case too, but the rest of str is unreliable. It could be that an error in format codes was detected by libc, or on platforms with a non-C99 vsnprintf simply that the buffer wasn't big enough to avoid truncation, or on platforms without any vsnprintf that PyMem_Malloc couldn't obtain space for a temp buffer. CAUTION: Unlike C99, str != NULL and size > 0 are required. */ int PyOS_snprintf(char *str, size_t size, const char *format, ...) { int rc; va_list va; va_start(va, format); rc = PyOS_vsnprintf(str, size, format, va); va_end(va); return rc; } int PyOS_vsnprintf(char *str, size_t size, const char *format, va_list va) { int len; /* # bytes written, excluding \0 */ #ifdef HAVE_SNPRINTF #define _PyOS_vsnprintf_EXTRA_SPACE 1 #else #define _PyOS_vsnprintf_EXTRA_SPACE 512 char *buffer; #endif assert(str != NULL); assert(size > 0); assert(format != NULL); /* We take a size_t as input but return an int. Sanity check * our input so that it won't cause an overflow in the * vsnprintf return value or the buffer malloc size. */ if (size > INT_MAX - _PyOS_vsnprintf_EXTRA_SPACE) { len = -666; goto Done; } #ifdef HAVE_SNPRINTF len = vsnprintf(str, size, format, va); #else /* Emulate it. */ buffer = PyMem_MALLOC(size + _PyOS_vsnprintf_EXTRA_SPACE); if (buffer == NULL) { len = -666; goto Done; } len = vsprintf(buffer, format, va); if (len < 0) /* ignore the error */; else if ((size_t)len >= size + _PyOS_vsnprintf_EXTRA_SPACE) Py_FatalError("Buffer overflow in PyOS_snprintf/PyOS_vsnprintf"); else { const size_t to_copy = (size_t)len < size ? (size_t)len : size - 1; assert(to_copy < size); memcpy(str, buffer, to_copy); str[to_copy] = '\0'; } PyMem_FREE(buffer); #endif Done: if (size > 0) str[size-1] = '\0'; return len; #undef _PyOS_vsnprintf_EXTRA_SPACE }
